Tuesday 18 March 2008

மாமேதை கார்ல் மார்க்ஸ் மறைவின் 125 ம் ஆண்டு நிறைவு

கல்லறை வாசகம்:
''தத்துவஞானிகள் உலகத்துக்குப் பல்வேறு வழிகளில் விளக்கமளிப்பதை மட்டுமே செய்து வந்திருக்கிறார்கள்; ஆனால் அதை மாற்றுவதுதான் இன்று முக்கியமாகும்.''
(பாயர்பாக்ஹ் பற்றிய 11ம் ஆய்வுரை) கார்ல் மார்க்ஸ்:
May 5,1818 - March 14, 1883
பி.எங்கெல்ஸ்
கார்ல் மார்க்சின் உடலைப் புதைக்கின்ற பொழுது நிகழ்த்திய உரை.
மார்ச் 14ம் தேதியன்று பிற்பகல் இரண்டே முக்கால் மணிக்கு நம்மிடையே வாழ்ந்த மாபெரும் சிந்தனையாளர் சிந்திப்பதை நிறுத்திக்கொண்டார். நாங்கள் அவரை விட்டுப் பிரிந்து இரண்டு நிமிடங்கள் கூட ஆகியிருக்காது; நாங்கள் திரும்பி வந்த பொழுது அவர் தன்னுடைய சாய்வு நாற்காலியில் அமைதியாக ஆனால் நிரந்தரமாக உறங்கிக்கொண்டிருப்பதைக் கண்டோம்.
இந்தமேதையின் மரணம் ஐரோப்பாவிலும் அமெரிக்காவிலும் போர்க்குணமிக்க பாட்டாளிவர்க்கத்துக்கும் வரலாற்று விஞ்ஞானத்திற்கும் அளவிடமுடியாத இழப்பை ஏற்படுத்தியிருக்கிறது. இம்மகத்தான மனிதருடைய பிரிவினால் ஏற்பட்டிருகின்ற இடைவெளியை நாம் சீக்கிரமாகவே உணர்வோம்.
அங்கக இயற்கையின் வளர்ச்சி விதியை டார்வின் கண்டுபிடித்ததைப்போல, மனித சமூக வரலாற்றின் வளர்ச்சி விதியை மார்க்ஸ் கண்டுபிடித்தார்:மனிதன் அரசியல், விஞ்ஞானம், கலை,சமயம், இதரவற்றில் ஈடுபடும் முன்னர், முதலில் உண்ண உணவையும், இருக்க இருப்பிடத்தையும் உடுக்க உடையையும் பெற்றிருக்க வேண்டும் என்னும் சாதாரண உண்மை இதுவரை சித்தாந்த மிகை வளர்ச்சியினால் மூடிமறைக்கப் பட்டிருந்தது; ஆகவே உடனடியான பொருளாயத வாழ்க்கைச் சாதனங்களை உற்பத்தி செய்தல், அதன் காரணமாக ஒரு குறிப்பிட்ட மக்களினம் அல்லது குறிப்பிட்ட சகாப்தத்தின் போது அடைந்திருக்கின்ற பொருளாதார வளர்ச்சியின் அளவு என்னும் அடிப்படையின் மீது சம்பந்தப்பட்ட அரசு நிறுவனங்கள், சட்டவியல் கருதுகோள்கள், கலை மற்றும் மதக் கருத்துக்கள் கூட வளர்ச்சியடைகின்றன; ஆகவே அதன் ஒளியில் தான் அவற்றை விளக்க வேண்டுமே அல்லாது இதுவரை செய்யப்பட்டதைப் போல மறுதலையாக விளக்கக் கூடாது.
ஆனால் அது மட்டுமல்ல, மார்க்ஸ் இன்றைய முதலாளித்துவ உற்பத்திமுறை மற்றும் அந்த உற்பத்திமுறை தோற்றுவித்துள்ள பூர்ஷ்வா சமூகத்தின் இயக்கத்தின் விசேச விதியையும் கண்டுபிடித்தார். அவர் உபரி மதிப்பைக் கண்டு பிடித்தது திடீரென்று அபிரச்சனையின் மீது ஒளியைப் பாய்ச்சியது; அப்பிரச்சனையைத் தீர்ப்பதற்கு முதலாளிவர்க்கப் பொருளியலாளர்கள், சோசலிஸ்டு விமர்சகர்கள் இதற்கு முன்பு செய்த எல்லா ஆராய்ச்சிகளும் இருட்டிலே திண்டாடிக் கொண்டிருந்தன.
ஒரு முழு வாழ்க்கைக் காலத்துக்கு அத்தகைய இரண்டு கண்டுபிடிப்புகளே போதும். அத்தகைய ஒரு கண்டுபிடிப்பை செய்ய முடிந்தால் கூட அந்த மனிதர் அதிஸ்டமுடையவரே. ஆனால் மார்க்ஸ் தன்னுடைய ஆராய்ச்சியின் ஒவ்வொரு துறையிலும் - அவர் பல துறைகளை ஆராய்ந்தார், ஒரு துறையில் கூட மேம்போக்கான ஆராய்ச்சி செய்யவில்லை- கணிதத்தில் கூட சுயேச்சையான கண்டுபிடிப்புக்களைச் செய்தார்.
அத்தகைய விஞ்ஞான மனிதர் அவர்.ஆனால் இது அவருடைய சாதனையில் அரைப்பங்கு கூட அல்ல.மார்க்ஸ் விஞ்ஞானத்தை இயக்காற்றல் உடைய சக்தியாகக் கண்டார். ஏதாவதொரு தத்துவார்த்த விஞ்ஞானத்துறையில் ஒரு புதிய கண்டுபிடிப்பை- அதன் செய்முறைப் பிரயோகம் எப்படியிருக்கும் என்பது இன்னும் முழுமையாகக் கற்பனை செய்ய முடியாத நிலையில்- அவர் எத்துணை அதிகமான மகிழ்ச்சியுடன் வரவேற்ற போதிலும், அக்கண்டுபிடிப்பு தொழில்துறையில் மற்றும் பொதுவாக வரலாற்று வளர்ச்சியில் உடனடியான புரட்சிகர மாற்றங்களைத் தூண்டுமானால் முற்றிலும் வேறுவிதமாக மகிழ்ச்சியடைந்தார்.உதாரணமாக, மின்சாரத்துறையில் கண்டுபிடிப்புகளின் வளர்ச்சியை அவர் நுணுக்கமாகக் கவனித்தார்.சமீபகாலத்தில் மார்செல் டெப்ரேயின் ஆராய்ச்சிகளைப்பற்றியும் அப்படியே செய்தார்.
ஏனென்றால் மார்க்ஸ் முதலில் ஒரு புரட்சிக்காரர்.ஏதாவதொரு வழியில் முதலாளித்துவ சமூகத்தை மற்றும் அது உருவாக்கியிருக்கின்ற அரசு நிறுவனங்களை ஒழிப்பதற்கு, நவீனப்பாட்டாளி வர்க்கத்தின் - அதன் சொந்த நிலைகளையும் அதன் தேவையையும் உணரும்படி, அதன் விடுதலையின் நிலைமைகளை உணரும்படி செய்த முதல் நபர் அவரே-விடுதலைக்குப் பங்களிப்பது அவருடைய மெய்யான வாழ்க்கைப் பணியாகும். போராட்டமே அவருக்கு உயிர்.அவரைப்போல உணர்ச்சிகரமாக, உறுதியாக, வெற்றிகரமாகப் போராடுவதற்கு எவராலும் முடியாது.முதல்Rheinische Zeitung(1842)*,பாரிஸ்Vorwarts(1844)**,Deutsche Brusseler Zeitung(1847)***,Neue Rheinische Zeitung(1848-1849)***,New York Tribune****(1852-1861) இதழ்களிலும், போர்க்குணமிக்க பிரசுரங்களிலும்,பாரிஸ், பிரஸ்ஸல்ஸ் மற்றும் லண்டன் ஸ்தாபனங்களில் அவருடைய பணி; இறுதியாக, எல்லாவற்றுக்கும் சிகரமாக சர்வதேச தொழிலாளர் சங்கத்தை நிறுவினார்.அவர் வேறு ஒன்றையும் செய்யாதிருந்தால் கூட இந்தச்சாதனையைப் பற்றி மட்டுமே நிச்சயமாகப் பெருமை அடைய முடியும்.
ஆகவே மார்க்ஸ் தம் காலத்தில் அதிகமாக வெறுக்கப்பட்ட, அவதூறு செய்யப்பட்ட மனிதராக இருந்தார்.எதேச்சாதிகார அரசாங்கங்கள், குடியாட்சி அரசாங்கங்கள் ஆகிய இரண்டுமே அவரைத்தம்முடைய நாடுகளில் இருந்து வெளியேற்றின. முதலாளி வர்க்கத்தினர்- அவர்கள் பழமைவாதிகளோ அல்லது அதி தீவிர ஜனநாயகவாதிகளோ- மார்க்ஸ் மீது அவதூறுகளைக் குவிப்பதில் ஒருவருக்கொருவர் போட்டியிட்டனர்.இவை அனைத்தையும் அவர் ஒட்டடையைப் போல ஒதுக்கித் தள்ளினார், அவற்றைப் புறக்கணித்தார்; இன்றியமையாத அவசியம் நிர்ப்பந்தித்தால் மட்டுமே அவற்றுக்குப் பதில் அளித்தார்.சைபீரியாவின் சுரங்கங்களிலிருந்து கலிபோர்னியா வரை, ஐரோப்பா மற்றும் அமெரிக்கக் கண்டங்களின் எல்லாப்பகுதிகளிலும் லட்சக்கணக்கான சக தொழிலாளர்களின் அன்புக்கும் மரியாதைக்கும் உரியவராக அவர் மரணமடைந்த பொழுது அவர்கள் கண்ணீரைச் சொரிந்தார்கள். அவருக்குப் பல எதிரிகள் இருந்திருக்கலாம்,ஆனால் அநேகமாக ஒரு தனிப்பட்ட விரோதிகூட இல்லை என்று நான் துணிந்து கூறுவேன்.
அவர் பெயர் யுகங்களுக்கும் நிலைத்திருக்கும்; அவருடைய பணியும் நிலைத்திருக்கும்!
==================
மார்ச்17, 1883ல்லண்டன், ஹைகேட் இடுகாட்டில் பி.எங்கெல்ஸ் ஆங்கில மொழியில் நிகழ்த்திய உரை.Der Sozialdemokrat பத்திரிகை, எண்13, மார்ச் 22, 1883 என்ற இதழில் ஜேர்மன் மொழியில் வெளியிடப்பட்டது.பத்திரிகை வாசகப்படி கையெழுத்துப் பிரதியின் ஆங்கில வாசகத்துடன் சரிபார்த்து அச்சிடப்பட்டது.மூலம் ஜேர்மன் மொழியில் எழுதப்பட்டது.
==================
ENB பிரசுரிப்பாளர் குறிப்பு: முன்னேற்றப் பதிப்பகம் மாஸ்கோ வெளியிட்ட 'மார்க்ஸ் எங்கெல்ஸ் தேர்வு நூல்கள் பன்னிரெண்டு தொகுதிகளில்' (1989), தொகுதி 10, பக்கங்கள்(145-148) இலிருந்து, மறு பிரசுரம் செய்யப்பட்டது.*(63)/**(64)/***(65)/****(66) இவை தொகுதி 10 இன் பதிப்பாளர் குறிப்பின் எண்களைக் குறிக்கின்றன.
===================
The Death of Karl Marx
Frederick Engels’ Speech at the Grave of Karl MarxHighgate Cemetery,
London. March 17, 1883
[Transcribed: by Mike Lepore, 1993.(Marx Engles Library)]
On the 14th of March, at a quarter to three in the afternoon, the greatest living thinker ceased to think. He had been left alone for scarcely two minutes, and when we came back we found him in his armchair, peacefully gone to sleep -- but for ever.
An immeasurable loss has been sustained both by the militant proletariat of Europe and America, and by historical science, in the death of this man. The gap that has been left by the departure of this mighty spirit will soon enough make itself felt.
Just as Darwin discovered the law of development or organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of development of human history: the simple fact, hitherto concealed by an overgrowth of ideology, that mankind must first of all eat, drink, have shelter and clothing, before it can pursue politics, science, art, religion, etc.; that therefore the production of the immediate material means, and consequently the degree of economic development attained by a given people or during a given epoch, form the foundation upon which the state institutions, the legal conceptions, art, and even the ideas on religion, of the people concerned have been evolved, and in the light of which they must, therefore, be explained, instead of vice versa, as had hitherto been the case.
But that is not all. Marx also discovered the special law of motion governing the present-day capitalist mode of production, and the bourgeois society that this mode of production has created. The discovery of surplus value suddenly threw light on the problem, in trying to solve which all previous investigations, of both bourgeois economists and socialist critics, had been groping in the dark.
Two such discoveries would be enough for one lifetime. Happy the man to whom it is granted to make even one such discovery. But in every single field which Marx investigated -- and he investigated very many fields, none of them superficially -- in every field, even in that of mathematics, he made independent discoveries.
Such was the man of science. But this was not even half the man. Science was for Marx a historically dynamic, revolutionary force. However great the joy with which he welcomed a new discovery in some theoretical science whose practical application perhaps it was as yet quite impossible to envisage, he experienced quite another kind of joy when the discovery involved immediate revolutionary changes in industry, and in historical development in general. For example, he followed closely the development of the discoveries made in the field of electricity and recently those of Marcel Deprez.
For Marx was before all else a revolutionist. His real mission in life was to contribute, in one way or another, to the overthrow of capitalist society and of the state institutions which it had brought into being, to contribute to the liberation of the modern proletariat, which he was the first to make conscious of its own position and its needs, conscious of the conditions of its emancipation. Fighting was his element. And he fought with a passion, a tenacity and a success such as few could rival. His work on the first Rheinische Zeitung (1842), the Paris Vorwarts (1844), the Deutsche Brusseler Zeitung (1847), the Neue Rheinische Zeitung (1848-49), the New York Tribune (1852-61), and, in addition to these, a host of militant pamphlets, work in organisations in Paris, Brussels and London, and finally, crowning all, the formation of the great International Working Men's Association -- this was indeed an achievement of which its founder might well have been proud even if he had done nothing else.
And, consequently, Marx was the best hated and most calumniated man of his time. Governments, both absolutist and republican, deported him from their territories. Bourgeois, whether conservative or ultra-democratic, vied with one another in heaping slanders upon him. All this he brushed aside as though it were a cobweb, ignoring it, answering only when extreme necessity compelled him. And he died beloved, revered and mourned by millions of revolutionary fellow workers -- from the mines of Siberia to California, in all parts of Europe and America -- and I make bold to say that, though he may have had many opponents, he had hardly one personal enemy.
His name will endure through the ages, and so also will his work.

137th Anniversary of the Paris Commune

137th Anniversary of the Paris Commune






1891 Introduction by Frederick Engels
On the 20th Anniversary of the Paris Communie
Historical Background &Overview of the Civil War
Thanks to the economic and political development of France since [the French Revolution of] 1789, for 50 years the position of Paris has been such that no revolutions could break out there without assuming a proletarian character, that is to say, the proletariat, which had bought victory with its blood, would advance its own demands after victory. These demands were more or less unclear and even confused, corresponding to the state of evolution reached by the workers of Paris at the particular period, but in the last resort they all amounted to the abolition of the class antagonism between capitalist and workers. It is true that no one knew how this was to be brought about. But the demand itself, however indefinite it still was in its formulation, contained a threat to the existing order of society; the workers who put it forward were still armed; therefore the disarming of the workers was the first commandment for the bourgeois at the helm of the state. Hence, after every revolution won by the workers, a new struggle, ending with the defeat of the workers.
This happened for the first time in 1848. The liberal bourgeoisie of the parliamentary opposition held banquets for securing reform of the franchise, which was to ensure supremacy for their party. Forced more and more, in their struggle with the government, to appeal to the people, they had to allow the radical and republican strata of the bourgeoisie and petty bourgeoisie gradually to take the lead. But behind these stood the revolutionary workers, and since 1830,[A] these had acquired far more political independence than the bourgeoisie, and even the republicans, suspected. At the moment of the crisis between the government and the opposition, the workers opened battle on the streets; [King] Louis Philippe vanished, and with him the franchise reform; and in its place arose the republic, and indeed one which the victorious workers themselves designated as a "social" republic. No one, however, was clear as to what this social republic was to imply; not even the workers themselves. But they now had arms in their hands, and were a power in the state. Therefore, as soon as the bourgeois republicans in control felt something like firm ground under their feet, their first aim was to disarm the workers. This took place by driving them into the insurrection of June 1848 by direct breach of faith, by open defiance and the attempt to banish the unemployed to a distant province. The government had taken care to have an overwhelming superiority of force. After five days' heroic struggle, the workers were defeated. And then followed a blood-bath of the defenceless prisoners, the likes of which as not been seen since the days of the civil wars which ushered in the downfall of the Roman republic. It was the first time that the bourgeoisie showed to what insane cruelties of revenge with will be goaded the moment the proletariat dares to take its stand against them as a separate class, with its own interests and demands. And yet 1848 was only child's play compared with their frenzy in 1871.
Punishment followed hard at heel. If the proletariat was not yet able to rule France, the bourgeoisie could no longer do so. At least not at that period, when the greater part of it was still monarchically inclined, and it was divided into three dynastic parties [Legitimists, Orleanists and Bonapartists] and a fourth republican party. Its internal dissensions allowed the adventurer Louis Bonaparte to take possession of all the commanding points – army, police, administrative machinery – and, on December 2, 1851,[B] to explode the last stronghold of the bourgeoisie, the National Assembly. The Second Empire opened the exploitation of France by a gang of political and financial adventurers, but at the same time also an industrial development such as had never been possible under the narrow-minded and timorous system of Louis Philippe, with its exclusive domination by only a small section of the big bourgeoisie. Louis Bonaparte took the political power from the capitalists under the pretext of protecting them, the bourgeoisie, from the workers, and on the other hand the workers from them; but in return his rule encouraged speculation and industrial activity – in a word the rise and enrichment of the whole bourgeoisie to an extent hitherto unknown. To an even greater extent, it is true, corruption and mass robbery developed, clustering around the imperial court, and drawing their heavy percentages from this enrichment.
But the Second Empire was the appeal to the French chauvinism, the demand for the restoration of the frontiers of the First Empire, which had been lost in 1814, or at least those of the First Republic.[C] A French empire within the frontiers of the old monarchy and, in fact, within the even more amputated frontiers of 1815 – such a thing was impossible for any long duration of time. Hence the necessity for brief wars and extension of frontiers. But no extension of frontiers was so dazzling to the imagination of the French chauvinists as the extension to the German left bank of the Rhine. One square mile on the Rhine was more to them than ten in the Alps or anywhere else. Given the Second Empire, the demand for the restoration to France of the left bank of the Rhine, either all at once or piecemeal, was merely a question of time. The time came with the Austro-Prussian War of 1866; cheated of the anticipated "territorial compensation" by Bismarck, and by his own over-cunning, hesitating policy, there was not nothing left for Napoleon but war, which broke out in 1870 and drove him first to Sedan, and then to Wilhelmshohe [prison].
The inevitable result was the Paris Revolution of September 4, 1870. The empire collapsed like a house of cards, and the republic was again proclaimed. But the enemy was standing at the gates [of Paris]; the armies of the empire were either hopelessly beleaguered in Metz or held captive in Germany. In this emergency the people allowed the Paris Deputies to the former legislative body to constitute themselves into a "Government of National Defence." This was the more readily conceded, since, for the purpose of defence, all Parisians capable of bearing arms had enrolled in the National Guard and were armed, so that now the workers constituted a great majority. But almost at once the antagonism between the almost completely bourgeois government and the armed proletariat broke into open conflict. On October 31, workers' battalions stormed the town hall, and captured some members of the government. Treachery, the government's direct breach of its undertakings, and the interventions of some petty-bourgeois battalions set them free again, and in order not to occassion the outbreak of civil war inside a city which was already beleaguered by a foreign power, the former government was left in office.
At last on January 28, 1871, Paris, almost starving, capitulated but with honors unprecedented in the history of war. The forts were surrendered, the outer wall disarmed, the weapons of the regiments of the line and of the Mobile Guard were handed over, and they themselves considered prisoners of war. But the National Guard kept its weapons and guns, and only entered into an armistice with the victors, who themselves did not dare enter Paris in triumph. They only dared to occupy a tiny corner of Paris, which, into the bargain, consisted partly of public parks, and even this they only occupied for a few days! And during this time they, who had maintained their encirclement of Paris for 131 days, were themselves encircled by the armed workers of Paris, who kept a sharp watch that no "Prussian" should overstep the narrow bounds of the corner ceded to the foreign conquerors. Such was the respect which the Paris workers inspired in the army before which all the armies of the empire had laid down their arms; and the Prussian Junkers, who had come to take revenge at the very centre of the revolution, were compelled to stand by respectfully, and salute just precisely this armed revolution!
During the war the Paris workers had confined themselves to demanding the vigorous prosecution of the fight. But now, when peace had come after the capitulation of Paris,[D] now, Thiers, the new head of government, was compelled to realize that the supremacy of the propertied classes – large landowners and capitalists – was in constant danger so long as the workers of Paris had arms in their hands. His first action was to attempt to disarm them. On March 18, he sent troops of the line with orders to rob the National Guard of the artillery belonging to it, which had been constructed during the siege of Paris and had been paid for by public subscription. The attempt failed; Paris mobilized as one man in defence of the guns, and war between Paris and the French government sitting at Versailles was declared. On March 26 the Paris Commune was elected and on March 28 it was proclaimed. The Central Committee of the National Guard, which up to then had carried on the government, handed in its resignation to the National Guard, after it had first decreed the abolition of the scandalous Paris "Morality Police." On March 30 the Commune abolished conscription and the standing army, and declared that the National Guard, in which all citizens capable of bearing arms were to be enrolled, was to be the sole armed force. It remitted all payments of rent for dwelling houses from October 1870 until April, the amounts already paid to be reckoned to a future rental period, and stopped all sales of article pledged in the municipal pawnshops. On the same day the foreigners elected to the Commune were confirmed in office, because "the flag of the Commune is the flag of the World Republic."
On April 1 it was decided that the highest salary received by any employee of the Commune, and therefore also by its members themselves, might not exceed 6,000 francs. On the following day the Commune decreed the separation of the Church from the State, and the abolition of all state payments for religious purposes as well as the transformation of all Church property into national property; as a result of which, on April 8, a decree excluding from the schools all religious symbols, pictures, dogmas, prayers – in a word, "all that belongs to the sphere of the individual's conscience" – was ordered to be excluded from the schools, and this decree was gradually applied. On the 5th, day after day, in reply to the shooting of the Commune's fighters captured by the Versailles troops, a decree was issued for imprisonment of hostages, but it was never carried into effect. On the 6th, the guillotine was brought out by the 137th battalion of the National guard, and publicly burnt, amid great popular rejoicing. On the 12th, the Commune decided that the Victory Column on the Place Vendôme, which had been cast from guns captured by napoleon after the war of 1809, should be demolished as a symbol of chauvinism and incitement to national hatred. This decree was carried out on May 16. On April 16 the Commune ordered a statistical tabulation of factories which had been closed down by the manufacturers, and the working out of plans for the carrying on of these factories by workers formerly employed in them, who were to be organized in co-operative societies, and also plans for the organization of these co-operatives in one great union. On the 20th the Commune abolished night work for bakers, and also the workers' registration cards, which since the Second Empire had been run as a monopoly by police nominees – exploiters of the first rank; the issuing of these registration cards was transferred to the mayors of the 20 arrondissements of Paris. On April 30, the Commune ordered the closing of the pawnshops, on the ground that they were a private exploitation of labor, and were in contradiction with the right of the workers to their instruments of labor and to credit. On May 5 it ordered the demolition of the Chapel of Atonement, which had been built in expiation of the execution of Louis XVI.
Thus, from March 18 onwards the class character of the Paris movement, which had previously been pushed into the background by the fight against the foreign invaders, emerged sharply and clearly. As almost without exception, workers, or recognized representatives of the workers, sat in the Commune, its decision bore a decidedly proletarian character. Either they decreed reforms which the republican bourgeoisie had failed to pass soley out of cowardice, but which provided a necessary basis for the free activity of the working class – such as the realization of the principle that in relation to the state, religion is a purely private matter – or they promulgated decrees which were in the direct interests of the working class and to some extent cut deeply into the old order of society. In a beleaguered city, however, it was possible at most to make a start in the realization of all these measures. And from the beginning of May onwards all their energies were taken up by the fight against the ever-growing armies assembled by the Versailles government.
On April 7, the Versailles troops had captured the Seine crossing at Neuilly, on the western front of Paris; on the other hand, in an attack on the southern front on the 11th they were repulsed with heavy losses by General Eudes. Paris was continually bombarded and, moreover, by the very people who had stigmatized as a sacrilege the bombardment of the same city by the Prussians. These same people now begged the Prussian government for the hasty return of the French soldiers taken prisoner at Sedan and Metz, in order that they might recapture Paris for them. From the beginning of May the gradual arrival of these troops gave the Versailles forces a decided ascendancy. This already became evident when, on April 23, Thiers broke off the negotiations for the exchange, proposed by Commune, of the Archbishop of Paris [Georges Darboy] and a whole number of other priests held hostages in Paris, for only one man, Blanqui, who had twice been elected to the Commune but was a prisoner in Clairvaux. And even more in the changed langauge of Thiers; previously procrastinating and equivocal, he now suddenly became insolent, threatening, brutal. The Versailles forces took the redoubt of Moulin Saquet on the southern front, on May 3; on the 9th, Fort Issy, which had been completely reduced to ruins by gunfire; and on the 14th, Fort Vanves. On the western front they advanced gradually, capturing the numerous villages and buildings which extended up to the city wall, until they reached the main wall itself; on the 21st, thanks to treachery and the carelessness of the National Guards stationed there, they succeeded in forcing their way into the city. The Prussians who held the northern and eastern forts allowed the Versailles troops to advance across the land north of the city, which was forbidden ground to them under the armistice, and thus to march forward and attack on a long front, which the Parisians naturally thought covered by the armistice, and therefore held only with weak forces. As a result of this, only a weak resistance was put up in the western half of Paris, in the luxury city proper; it grew stronger and more tenacious the nearer the incoming troops approached the eastern half, the real working class city.
It was only after eight days' fighting that the last defender of the Commune were overwhelmed on the heights of Belleville and Menilmontant; and then the massacre of defenceless men, women, and children, which had been raging all through the week on an increasing scale, reached its zenith. The breechloaders could no longer kill fast enough; the vanquished workers were shot down in hundred by mitrailleuse fire [over 30,000 citizens of Paris were massacred]. The "Wall of the Federals" [aka Wall of the Communards] at the Pere Lachaise cemetery, where the final mass murder was consummated, is still standing today, a mute but eloquent testimony to the savagery of which the ruling class is capable as soon as the working class dares to come out for its rights. Then came the mass arrests [38,000 workers arrested]; when the slaughter of them all proved to be impossible, the shooting of victims arbitrarily selected from the prisoners' ranks, and the removal of the rest to great camps where they awaited trial by courts-martial. The Prussian troops surrounding the northern half of Paris had orders not to allow any fugitives to pass; but the officers often shut their eyes when the soldiers paid more obedience to the dictates of humanity than to those of the General Staff; particularly, honor is due to the Saxon army corps, which behaved very humanely and let through many workers who were obviously fighters for the Commune.
Frederick Engels
London, on the 20th anniversary of the Paris Commune, March 18, 1891.

=========================
Diary of events:
MARCH 18- 1871
March 18: Adolphe Thiers attempts to disarm Paris and sends French troops (regular army), but, through fraternization with Paris workers, they refuse to carry out
thier orders. Generals Claude Martin Lecomte and Jacques Leonard Clement Thomas are killed by their own soldiers. Many troops peacefully withdraw, some
remain in Paris. Thiers outraged, the Civil War begins.
March 26: A municipal council — the Paris Commune — is elected by the citizens of Paris. Commune consists of workers, among them members of the First
International and followers of Proudhon and Blanqui.
March 28: The Central Committee of the National Guard, which up to then had carried on the government, resigns after it first decrees the permanent abolition of the
"Morality Police".
March 30: The Commune abolishes conscription and the standing army; the National Guard, in which all citizens capable of bearing arms were to be enrolled, was to
be the sole armed force. The Commune remitts all payments of rent for dwelling houses from October 1870 until April 1871. On the same day the foreigners elected
to the Commune were confirmed in office, because "the flag of the Commune is the flag of the World Republic".
April 1: The Commune declares that the highest salary received by any member of the Commune does not exceed 6,000 francs
April 2: In order to suppress the Paris Commune Thiers appeals to Bismarck for permission to supplement the Versailles Army with French prisoners of war, most of
whom had been serving in the armies that surrendered at Sedan and Metz. In return for the 5 billion francs indemnity payment, Bismarck agrees. The French Army
begins seige of Paris. Paris is continually bombarded and, moreover, by the very people who had stigmatized as a sacrilege the bombardment of the same city by the
Prussians.
The Commune decrees the separation of the Church from the State, and the abolition of all state payments for religious purposes as well as the transformation of all
Church property into national property. Religion is declared a purely private matter.
April 5: Decree on hostages adopted by the Commune in an attempt to prevent Communards from being shot by the French Government. Under this decree, all
persons found guilty of being in contact with the French Government were declared hostages. This was never carried out.
April 6: The guillotine was brought out by the 137th battalion of the National guard, and publicly burnt, amid great popular rejoicing.
April 7: On April 7, the French army captures the Seine crossing at Neuilly, on the western front of Paris.
Reacting to French government policy of shooting captured Communards, Commune issues an "eye-for-an-eye" policy statement, threatening retaliation. The bluff is
quickly called; Paris workers execute no one.
April 8: A decree excluding from the schools all religious symbols, pictures, dogmas, prayers — in a word, "all that belongs to the sphere of the individual's
conscience" — is ordered to be excluded from the schools. The decree is gradually applied.
April 11: In an attack on southern Paris the French army is repulsed with heavy losses by General Eudes.
April 12: The Commune decides that the Victory Column on the Place Vendôme, which had been cast from guns captured by Napoleon after the war of 1809,
should be demolished as a symbol of chauvinism and incitement to national hatred. This decree was carried out on May 16.
April 16: Commune announces the postponement of all debt obligations for three years and abolition of interest on them.
The Commune orders a statistical tabulation of factories which had been closed down by the manufacturers, and the working out of plans for the carrying on of these
factories by workers formerly employed in them, who were to be organized in co-operative societies, and also plans for the organization of these co-operatives in one
great union.
April 20: The Commune abolishes night work for bakers, and also the workers' registration cards, which since the Second Empire had been run as a monopoly by
police nominees — exploiters of the first rank; the issuing of these registration cards was transferred to the mayors of the 20 arrondissements of Paris.
April 23: Thiers breaks off the negotiations for the exchange, proposed by Commune, of the Archbishop of Paris [Georges Darboy] and a whole number of other
priests held hostages in Paris, for only one man, Blanqui, who had twice been elected to the Commune but was a prisoner in Clairvaux.
April 27: In sight of the impending municipal elections of April 30, Thiers enacted one of his great conciliation scenes. He exclaimed from the tribune of the Assembly:
"There exists no conspiracy against the republic but that of Paris, which compels us to shed French blood. I repeat it again and again...". Out of 700,000 municipal
councillors, the united Legitimists, Orleanists, and Bonapartists ( Party of Order ) did not carry 8,000.
April 30: The Commune orders the closing of the pawnshops, on the ground that they were a private exploitation of labor, and were in contradiction with the right of
the workers to their instruments of labor and to credit.
May 5: On May 5 it ordered the demolition of the Chapel of Atonement, which had been built in expiation of the execution of Louis XVI.
May 9: Fort Issy, which is completely reduced to ruins by gunfire and constant French bombardement, is captured by the French army.
May 10: The peace treaty concluded in February now signed, known as Treaty of Frankfurt. (Endorsed by National Assembly May 18.)
May 16: The Vendôme Column is pulled down. The Vendôme Column was erected between 1806 and 1810 in Paris in honor of the victories of Napoleonic France;
it was made out of the bronze captured from enemy guns and was crowned by a statue of Napoleon.
May 21-28: Versailles troops enter Paris on May 21. The Prussians who held the northern and eastern forts allowed the Versailles troops to advance across the land
north of the city, which was forbidden ground to them under the armistice — Paris workers held the flank with only weak forces. As a result of this, only a weak
resistance was put up in the western half of Paris, in the luxury city; while it grew stronger and more tenacious the nearer the Versailles troops approached the eastern
half, the working class city.
The French army spent eight days massacring workers, shooting civilians on sight. The operation was led by Marshal MacMahon, who would later become president
of France. Tens of thousands of Communards and workers are summarily executed (as many as 30,000); 38,000 others imprisoned and 7,000 are forcibly deported.